Aob Lost Saga 12 January 2015

Aob Lost Saga 12 January 2015 4,3/5 5368 votes

Home › AOB Base String Offset Lost Saga › AOB Lost Saga 13 Januari 2015. AOB Lost Saga 13 Januari 2015 Sahrul Sidik Tuesday, January 13, 2015. Label AOB Base String Offset Lost Saga. Hayo Cepet Ambil AOBnya Mumpung Banyak Sebelum Mt, Kalo Mt Udah Selesai Pasti AOB Di Bawah Ada Yang Kena Fix. AOB: 08 50 8D 4D FC 51. Shahrukh khan dilwale dulhania le jayenge pics.

Beste Arthur, Even een technische vraag. Ik kom zowel het woord Wellenschieber (Trenkle) tegen als Phasenschieber. En het ziet er naar uit dat hetzelfde bedoeld wordt. Dit natuurlijk in verband met de Mammut. Maar is dat hetzelfde?

He wanted to know the difference between Wellenschieber and Phasenschieber, because famous Fritz Trenkle isn't consequent about it, in respect to Mammut. In a brainwave the solution popped up.

Let us first notice, that in the German language Welle means also a driven rotating rod or shaft (axis). Of course also what we understand being a regular wave. Be it an EM phenomenon or a physical movement of substances.

Aob Lost Saga 12 January 2015

Noticing the helix rotates as well as being moved in any position between the left and right limits, at will. Welle is connected onto a single circumstance and Wellen is plural.

In the so-called Wellenschieber incorporated in the M IV type height-finder they operate 6 devices in parallel, albeit, with geared ratios 1: 3: 5: 7: 9: 11. The last number belonged to the most outside antenna-array-groups, and ran 11 times that faster than the centre group; but was constructed such, that all reach the centre (central) position (of the Wellenschieber helix) at the same instant. In connection onto the the phase-shifting device is called correctly 'Kompensator'. Both apparatus do change signal phase, but the Kompensator doesn't simply change the phase of a line, but just so that the amount added to one side will substituted from other section. That is, by the way, just where the compensator principle stands for.

In the early development stage of the Wassermann system, they first tried to rely upon the same compensator type as has been used in the Mammut system. There are, however, several downsides. It proved that the Mammut type Kompensator gave a energy loss of about 40%; whilst the Siemens type Wellenschieber lost only 10%. Secondly, the Wassermann concept later tended to be broadband operation (118 MHz - 160 MHz), what might not have been simply to commence by means of the complicated Mammut Kompenstaor type, with its 102 adjustable stubs ().

Maybe - to be continued in due course By Arthur O.